Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Proposes a constitutional amendment requiring the federal government to balance its budget.
The problem
The federal government spends more money than it collects in taxes most years, creating large deficits and growing national debt that some believe threatens economic stability.
The proposal
Amends the Constitution to require Congress to pass budgets where spending does not exceed revenues, with limited exceptions for emergencies approved by Congress.
The impact
Would affect all Americans by changing how government budgets work, potentially limiting spending on programs and requiring difficult choices about taxes and services.
Forcing the government to balance budgets would prevent the national debt from growing indefinitely. This could reduce interest payments and free up money for other priorities over time.
A constitutional requirement would create a strong legal mandate for Congress to make tough budget decisions. It removes the ability to simply borrow more money to avoid difficult choices.
Countries with balanced budgets sometimes have stronger investor confidence. This could potentially lower borrowing costs for the government over the long term.
Limiting deficit spending could reduce the risk of a debt crisis where the government cannot borrow money. This protects the economy from potential financial instability.
During recessions or crises, governments often spend more to help people and stimulate the economy. A balanced budget requirement would make it harder to respond quickly to national emergencies.
Balancing budgets might require cutting spending on schools, healthcare, infrastructure, or social services. This could reduce benefits for vulnerable populations who depend on these programs.
Balancing the budget without cutting spending could require significant tax increases on individuals and businesses. This could slow economic growth and reduce household incomes.
Deciding what counts as an 'emergency' exception and how to fairly cut programs would be very controversial. Congress would face constant political battles over which groups lose funding.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5670
A bill to ensure the prudent obligation of budget authority, and for other purposes.
HR 10327
Cost Estimates Improvement Act
HR 6500
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027
HR 10078
Dollar-for-Dollar Deficit Reduction Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.