Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 510.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Joe Wilson (R-SC)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Prevents federal agencies from waiving fraud penalties for benefit program violations.
The problem
Federal agencies may waive fraud penalties when people break rules to get welfare benefits. This might let some fraud go unpunished or reduce consequences unfairly.
The proposal
The bill removes agencies' power to waive fraud penalties. Anyone caught committing fraud in federal benefit programs faces set consequences with no exceptions.
The impact
People receiving federal benefits face stricter fraud rules. Agencies lose flexibility to handle individual fraud cases. Benefit programs become more rigid in enforcement.
Everyone caught committing fraud faces the same penalties. This creates fair, predictable rules. No one gets special treatment to avoid consequences.
Prevents fraud from going unpunished. Discourages people from breaking rules to get benefits. Helps keep benefit programs trustworthy.
Strict rules may reduce fraud in federal programs. Shows government takes rule-breaking seriously. Could save taxpayer money spent on improper benefits.
Removes agencies' ability to consider individual circumstances. Prevents mercy for people who made honest mistakes. Hard penalties apply even in unusual situations.
Agencies cannot adjust penalties based on fraud severity. Minor errors treated same as intentional crimes. Makes enforcement less practical and responsive.
Strict rules could harm low-income people who accidentally break rules. Limited flexibility may punish people with less access to help. Could increase hardship for struggling families.
Removes tools agencies use to resolve fraud cases efficiently. Could create legal challenges and delays. May increase administrative costs and court battles.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.