Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires disclosure of Superfund contamination facts and exposure risks to the public.
The problem
People living near toxic waste sites often lack clear information about health risks and contamination levels. Current disclosure requirements may be incomplete or hard to understand.
The proposal
The bill mandates that Superfund sites must provide accessible facts about contamination and exposure risks to nearby residents and the public.
The impact
Residents near Superfund sites gain better information about environmental hazards. Property owners and developers may face stricter disclosure requirements. Communities can make more informed decisions.
Residents near contaminated sites will have clear, accurate facts about health risks. This helps people make informed decisions about where to live and work. Better information supports public health protection.
Mandatory disclosure creates accountability for site operators and government agencies. The public can see what contamination exists and what is being done about it. Transparency builds community trust.
Buyers and renters get honest information about nearby contamination before making decisions. This prevents hidden liability issues and protects consumers. Real estate markets function better with full disclosure.
People can take precautions if they know about exposure risks in their area. Communities can advocate for cleanup efforts and monitor progress. Informed residents are better protected.
Creating and distributing clear, accessible information requires significant spending. Site operators and government agencies must develop new systems and materials. Costs may be passed to taxpayers or other parties.
Full disclosure of contamination facts may reduce nearby property values. Homeowners and businesses near Superfund sites could face financial losses. This creates economic hardship for current property holders.
Detailed exposure information might cause unnecessary fear or panic in communities. People may misunderstand technical information about contamination levels. This could harm quality of life even if actual risk is low.
Creating consistent, understandable disclosure formats across thousands of sites is difficult. Standards must be clear enough to help but not so complex they confuse people. Enforcement and monitoring take additional resources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5652
Build American Efficiency Act
HR 4646
Whistleblower Protection Act of 2025
HR 1640
HEIRS Act of 2025
HR 10168
Veterans Housing Opportunity Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.