Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 513.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Burgess Owens (R-UT)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill aims to reduce fraud by healthcare providers in federal health programs.
The problem
Healthcare providers may commit fraud against federal health programs like Medicare and Medicaid, costing taxpayers money and reducing funds for patient care.
The proposal
The bill closes gaps in detection and enforcement of provider fraud through enhanced oversight, reporting requirements, and penalties for fraudulent billing practices.
The impact
Healthcare providers, patients, taxpayers, and federal health programs are affected. Stronger fraud prevention protects program funds and patient care quality.
Reducing fraud means federal health dollars go to actual patient care instead of being stolen. This helps Medicare and Medicaid serve more people effectively.
Honest providers are rewarded while fraudulent ones face consequences. This encourages quality care and protects patients from unnecessary or harmful procedures.
Honest healthcare providers compete fairly when fraud is punished. This prevents dishonest competitors from undercutting legitimate businesses.
Stronger enforcement makes federal health programs more trustworthy and sustainable for future generations.
Honest providers may spend money on new reporting systems and procedures to prove they are not committing fraud. Small medical offices could face higher expenses.
Enhanced oversight and reporting requirements might slow down billing processes and delay payments to providers, affecting their cash flow.
Increased monitoring and data collection may raise patient privacy questions about how much information is shared between programs and enforcement agencies.
Large hospital systems can afford compliance departments, but small clinics and solo practitioners may struggle with new requirements.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.