Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Proposes a constitutional amendment requiring the federal government to balance its budget each year.
The problem
The federal government regularly spends more money than it collects in taxes, creating debt that grows each year and concerns about long-term fiscal sustainability.
The proposal
Amends the Constitution to mandate that total federal spending cannot exceed total federal revenue in any fiscal year, with limited exceptions for national emergencies.
The impact
Affects all Americans by potentially changing how federal taxes are collected, how government services are funded, and how the economy grows or contracts.
A balanced budget requirement could prevent the national debt from growing indefinitely. This might reduce interest payments the government makes and free up money for other priorities over time.
A constitutional requirement would make lawmakers carefully consider spending decisions. This could reduce wasteful spending and make the budget process more serious and transparent.
A balanced budget could improve public trust in government financial management. Citizens worried about national debt might feel more secure about the country's economic future.
Structural budget rules could prevent the kind of extreme debt levels that create economic instability. This might protect future generations from serious financial problems.
During recessions, natural disasters, or national crises, the government often needs to spend more than it collects to help people. A balanced budget amendment could restrict necessary emergency spending.
To balance the budget, Congress might have to make severe cuts to Social Security, Medicare, defense, or schools. These cuts could harm vulnerable people who depend on government services.
Balancing the budget might require raising taxes significantly on individuals or businesses. Higher taxes could reduce economic growth and hurt businesses trying to hire workers.
Economic management sometimes requires spending more during downturns and less during growth periods. A rigid balanced budget rule removes this flexibility that economists say helps stabilize the economy.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5670
A bill to ensure the prudent obligation of budget authority, and for other purposes.
HR 10327
Cost Estimates Improvement Act
HR 6500
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027
HR 10078
Dollar-for-Dollar Deficit Reduction Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.