Latest action: Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 45. Record Vote Number: 22. (CR S410)
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Chip Roy (R-TX)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill to counter what supporters call an illegitimate international court through U.S. policy measures.
The problem
Supporters believe certain international court actions exceed legitimate authority or harm U.S. interests and allies.
The proposal
The bill would authorize measures to counteract or limit engagement with courts deemed illegitimate by the United States.
The impact
Affects U.S. foreign policy, international relations, and how America interacts with international legal institutions and allies.
Supporters argue this defends American independence from international bodies. They contend the U.S. should not accept rulings from courts it views as overreaching.
Proponents claim it protects U.S. allies from what they see as unjust international court actions. It signals commitment to standing with partner countries.
Advocates believe international courts need oversight. They argue this bill provides accountability for organizations operating globally.
Critics worry rejecting international courts weakens global legal systems. This could harm efforts to address crimes and conflicts internationally.
Opponents argue international courts exist to investigate serious crimes. Undermining them could protect individuals from legitimate prosecution.
Detractors fear this distances America from allies and undermines U.S. leadership. It may weaken America's voice in global affairs.
Critics question how 'illegitimate' courts are defined. Vague language could lead to inconsistent or politically motivated decisions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.