Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Bill aims to stop forced organ harvesting and punish countries involved in the practice.
The problem
Credible reports indicate some countries forcibly remove organs from prisoners and minorities. This violates human rights and international law. The U.S. has limited tools to address this.
The proposal
The bill would sanction countries engaged in forced organ harvesting, restrict their citizens from organ donation in U.S. programs, and require State Department reporting on the practice.
The impact
Foreign governments and officials face sanctions. International organ transplant practices may change. Patients needing transplants, diplomatic relationships, and human rights advocates are affected.
Targets a serious human rights violation affecting vulnerable populations. Sends international message that forced organ harvesting has consequences. Aligns U.S. policy with stated values on human dignity.
Uses sanctions as a tool to discourage participating countries from continuing the practice. May encourage other nations to adopt similar policies. Creates unified international stance against the violation.
Requires State Department to research and report on forced organ harvesting globally. Brings awareness to an under-reported issue. Provides Congress and public with verified information.
Prevents organs from unethical sources entering U.S. medical system. Ensures transplant recipients know organ origins. Maintains ethical standards in American healthcare.
Sanctions can damage relationships with targeted countries. May complicate negotiations on other important issues like trade or security. Could reduce U.S. influence in those regions.
Countries may ignore sanctions or continue practices secretly. Difficult to verify compliance or detect organ harvesting without international cooperation. Enforcement may prove weak in practice.
Requires State Department resources to investigate and verify claims. May be difficult to gather reliable evidence. Could face legal challenges or disputes over findings.
Targeted countries might retaliate against U.S. interests or citizens. Could affect legitimate trade or cultural exchanges. May harm innocent people in sanctioned nations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.