Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Stops new U.S. federal funding from going to Burma.
The problem
The bill addresses concerns about U.S. aid flowing to Burma, likely due to political instability, human rights issues, or governance concerns in that country.
The proposal
The bill prohibits the federal government from providing new funds or financial assistance to Burma or its government.
The impact
U.S. aid programs in Burma would stop. Burmese citizens, aid organizations, and diplomatic relationships with Burma would be affected.
The bill withholds funds from countries with serious political or human rights problems. This sends a message that the U.S. only supports governments meeting certain standards.
Reduces U.S. government spending on foreign aid. Redirects taxpayer money that might have gone to Burma.
Gives the U.S. a tool to pressure Burma to improve conditions. Restoring aid could be used as an incentive for positive changes.
Aid programs often help ordinary people with healthcare, education, and food. Cutting funds harms vulnerable populations who depend on these programs.
Aid gives the U.S. influence and relationships in Burma. Cutting it entirely may reduce America's ability to encourage positive change.
Stopping aid can harm relationships between the U.S. and Burma. This may make future cooperation on other issues more difficult.
Stops funding for NGOs and international organizations working in Burma. These groups lose resources to help people in need.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.